After seven years of investigation, the Grenfell Tower Inquiry has published its final report, providing a thorough account of the events leading up to the tragic fire on 14 June 2017, which claimed the lives of 72 people. Over the course of these seven years, the inquiry has scrutinised systemic failures in fire safety, building regulations, and the construction industry, exposing a catalogue of errors and missed opportunities that contributed to the disaster.

This article explores the key findings of the final report, which aims to deliver justice for the victims and their families, while setting out vital recommendations to prevent such a tragedy from ever happening again.

The inquiry uncovered deep systemic failures in regulatory oversight, construction practices, and government decision-making that spanned several decades. These failures were directly linked to deregulation efforts, cost-cutting measures, and the use of combustible materials in the refurbishment of Grenfell Tower.

1. Government Complacency: The report highlights that the Conservative government was fully aware of the risks posed by combustible cladding as early as the 1990s, yet failed to implement stricter safety regulations. The inquiry found that government policies prioritised deregulation over public safety, contributing to the conditions that allowed the fire to spread rapidly.
2. Local Authority Failures: The Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC), which owned Grenfell Tower, was criticised for lax enforcement of building safety standards. The inquiry found that RBKC’s Building Control Department failed to adequately oversee the refurbishment project, during which highly flammable cladding was installed on the tower.
3. Industry Negligence: The construction and cladding industries were also found culpable, with manufacturers like Arconic, Kingspan, and Celotex supplying unsafe materials. Despite knowing the risks, these companies continued to sell combustible products, which played a significant role in the fire’s spread.

One of the most harrowing aspects of the inquiry was the revelation that decades of warnings about fire safety risks were ignored. As far back as 1991, concerns were raised about the use of combustible materials in high-rise buildings, yet successive governments and industry leaders failed to act.

• Ignored Fire Safety Warnings: Despite clear warnings from fire safety experts, combustible cladding was installed on Grenfell Tower during its refurbishment in 2016. This decision was made even though government officials and manufacturers were fully aware of the dangers posed by these materials.
• Lack of Regulatory Enforcement: The inquiry found that building regulations were not properly enforced, and the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea failed in its duty to ensure the building met fire safety standards.

The inquiry’s focus on combustible cladding—specifically the Reynobond 55 PE panels from Arconic—and flammable insulation supplied by Kingspan and Celotex, revealed their significant role in the fire’s spread. These materials were identified as key contributors to the disaster, enabling the flames to rapidly engulf the building.

• Arconic’s Role: The Reynobond PE panels manufactured by Arconic were a major factor in the fire’s rapid spread. The report notes that Arconic continued to market the panels despite being aware of their combustibility.
• Kingspan and Celotex: These companies provided insulation materials that were similarly unsafe and contributed to the fire’s intensity. Kingspan’s K15 insulation and Celotex’s RS5000 were both used in the tower’s refurbishment despite serious concerns about their safety.

The London Fire Brigade (LFB) faced severe criticism in the final report for its handling of the emergency on the night of the fire. The stay-put policy, which was in place for too long, significantly increased the death toll. The inquiry found that the LFB failed to adapt its response to the unique and rapidly escalating nature of the fire.

Key Findings:

• Inflexible Stay-Put Policy: The LFB’s insistence on maintaining the stay-put policy led to a delay in evacuating residents, resulting in unnecessary loss of life.
• Inadequate Training and Communication: The report also highlighted poor communication between the LFB and residents, as well as inadequate training for fire crews in handling high-rise fires of this magnitude.

For the survivors and families of the victims, the seven years of the Grenfell Inquiry have been a long journey in search of justice. The Metropolitan Police continue their criminal investigation, which will determine if charges of corporate manslaughter or criminal negligence are appropriate. However, the public’s demand for accountability remains strong.

• Criminal Investigations: The Metropolitan Police are still investigating whether criminal charges should be brought against companies involved in the refurbishment, government officials, or local authorities. This process is expected to take up to 18 months.
• Public Demands for Justice: The inquiry’s findings have made it clear that Grenfell was preventable, and the public, especially those directly affected, will continue to press for justice and reform.

The final report provides a series of comprehensive recommendations aimed at preventing another tragedy like Grenfell. These recommendations target building safety regulations, contractor licensing, and the introduction of a golden thread of building information.

1. Creation of an Independent Regulatory Body: The inquiry recommends the establishment of a single, independent body to oversee all aspects of building safety, including the certification of construction materials and contractor licensing.
2. Mandatory Licensing for Contractors and Fire-Risk Assessors: The report calls for a licensing scheme that ensures only qualified professionals are involved in the construction and refurbishment of high-risk buildings (HRBs). This would prevent unqualified or negligent contractors from taking on projects that involve significant safety risks.
3. Golden Thread of Building Information: One of the key recommendations is the establishment of a golden thread of information that provides a live and accessible record of safety-critical information throughout a building’s lifecycle. This would ensure that all relevant safety data is available to those who need it, from designers to regulators and building managers.
4. Strengthening Fire Safety Regulations: The report recommends a complete overhaul of the UK’s fire safety regulations, including the introduction of mandatory fire safety strategies for all high-rise buildings. These strategies must be regularly audited to ensure compliance.

The seven-year Grenfell Tower Inquiry has brought to light decades of systemic failures that contributed to one of the worst building disasters in UK history. For the victims’ families and survivors, the publication of the final report is a step towards justice, but the fight is far from over.

Implementing the inquiry’s recommendations will be essential to ensuring that building safety standards are dramatically improved and that accountability is enforced at every level. The lessons learned from Grenfell must result in lasting reforms so that no other community endures such a tragic and avoidable loss.

If you would like to learn more about how Operance can help you can talk to one of our experts below.

If you would like to find out more about the pricing of our solutions, you can get a quote below.